of Startups Fail Because They Build Something Nobody Wants.
Don't become a statistic. Get a working prototype, real user feedback, and a clear go/no-go decision in 2-3 weeks—before you invest months and hundreds of thousands in full development.
Every week, promising startups burn through runway building products that won't succeed. Not because the team isn't talented. Not because the technology doesn't work. Because they skipped validation.
Our rapid prototyping process gives you the evidence you need to move forward with confidence—or pivot early while you still can.
The Expensive Mistake Most Founders Make
The startup graveyard is filled with well-funded companies that built impressive products nobody wanted. The pattern is painfully predictable:
The Assumption Trap
You have an idea you believe in. Your team believes in it. Maybe even early investors believe in it. But belief isn't validation. Without testing your assumptions against real users and real market conditions, you're gambling with time and capital you can't afford to lose.
The Feature Creep Spiral
You start with a clear vision, then add "just one more feature" to make it perfect. Six months later, you've built a complex product and spent $200K—only to discover users wanted something simpler. Or something completely different.
The Technical Fantasy
Your concept sounds great in pitch decks, but can it actually be built with your timeline and budget? Many founders discover technical limitations after they've already committed resources. A feasibility assessment upfront prevents expensive surprises.
The Funding Fumble
Investors have seen too many "great ideas" fail. They want evidence. Walking into a pitch with just slides and enthusiasm isn't enough anymore. A working prototype with user validation data changes the conversation from "trust me" to "look at this."
The Pivot Paralysis
The longer you build without validation, the harder it becomes to change direction. Sunk cost fallacy kicks in. Teams get attached to solutions. By the time you realize you're building the wrong thing, you've burned through months or years of runway.
The Numbers Don't Lie:
of startups fail because there's no market need
run out of cash—often spent building the wrong thing
of premature scaling leads to failure
average burn before a failed startup shuts down
Rapid Prototyping: From Idea to Validated Concept in Weeks, Not Months
Rapid prototyping is a structured approach to validating product ideas before committing to full-scale development. Instead of spending 6-12 months building a complete product, you create a working prototype that lets you test your core assumptions with real users.
The goal isn't to build a perfect product. It's to learn whether your idea is worth building at all—and if so, exactly what to build.
What You Get
A Working Prototype
Not wireframes. Not mockups. A clickable, interactive prototype that looks and feels like a real product. Users can tap buttons, navigate screens, and experience the core functionality. This isn't a sketch of your vision—it's a tangible representation users can actually test.
Real User Research
We don't guess what users want. We ask them. Through structured interviews, usability testing, and feedback sessions, we uncover what resonates, what confuses, and what's missing. You'll hear directly from your target market—not filtered through assumptions.
Technical Feasibility Assessment
Can your idea actually be built? What technologies make sense? Where are the technical risks? Our engineering team evaluates architecture, integration requirements, scalability considerations, and potential blockers before you commit to development.
A Clear Go/No-Go Decision
This is the outcome that matters most. Based on user feedback, technical assessment, and market signals, you'll have the evidence to decide: move forward with confidence, pivot to a better approach, or kill the project before it wastes more resources.
What We Build vs. What Others Offer
| Prototype Type | What It Is | Validation Power | Our Approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wireframes | Basic layout sketches | Low - users can't interact | Starting point only |
| Static Mockups | Visual designs without interaction | Medium - shows look, not feel | Intermediate step |
| Clickable Prototype | Interactive screens with navigation | High - users experience the flow | Our deliverable |
| Functional Prototype | Working code with real data | Very High - users test real functionality | Available for complex validations |
The 2-3 Week Validation Sprint
Our rapid prototyping process is designed for speed without sacrificing rigor. Every exercise, every deliverable, every decision point exists because it accelerates learning and reduces risk.
Discovery & Alignment
What Happens
We immerse ourselves in your vision, your market, and your assumptions. This isn't a requirements gathering exercise—it's an assumption mapping session.
Key Activities
- Stakeholder interviews to understand the vision and success criteria
- Assumption mapping to identify what must be true for success
- Target user profiling to define who we're validating with
- Competitive landscape review to understand market context
- Risk identification to prioritize what to test
Deliverable
Validation Plan documenting key assumptions, target users, success metrics, and testing approach
Why It Matters
Most validation efforts fail because they test the wrong things. This phase ensures we're focused on the assumptions that will make or break your product.
User Research
What Happens
We talk to real users in your target market. Not friends. Not family. Not people who will tell you what you want to hear. Real potential customers who will give honest feedback.
Key Activities
- Recruiting 8-12 participants matching your target user profile
- Conducting structured interviews to understand pain points and needs
- Exploring current solutions and workarounds
- Testing initial concepts and value propositions
- Identifying language users actually use (for marketing and UX)
Deliverable
Research Synthesis with key insights, user quotes, and validated/invalidated assumptions
Why It Matters
User research at this stage prevents the most expensive mistake in product development: building something users don't actually want.
Prototype Development
What Happens
Based on research insights, we design and build an interactive prototype that embodies your validated value proposition. This happens in parallel with late-stage user research.
Key Activities
- Information architecture and user flow design
- UI/UX design aligned with user expectations
- Interactive prototype development in Figma/prototyping tools
- Internal testing and refinement
- Preparation for user testing sessions
Deliverable
Clickable Prototype ready for user validation
Why It Matters
A picture is worth a thousand words. A prototype is worth a thousand pictures. Users can interact with something tangible, revealing insights that interviews alone can't surface.
Validation Testing
What Happens
We put the prototype in front of users and watch what happens. This is where assumptions meet reality.
Key Activities
- Moderated usability testing sessions with target users
- Task completion tracking and friction point identification
- Concept validation and value proposition testing
- Pricing and willingness-to-pay exploration (when relevant)
- Competitive comparison reactions
Deliverable
Validation Report with test results, user feedback synthesis, and recommendations
Why It Matters
This is the moment of truth. Users either validate your concept or reveal the gaps. Either outcome is valuable—but only if you get it before building.
Technical Assessment
What Happens
While design and testing proceed, our engineering team evaluates the technical feasibility and requirements for building the real product.
Key Activities
- Architecture options analysis
- Technology stack recommendations
- Integration requirements identification
- Scalability considerations
- Security and compliance review (when relevant)
- Development effort estimation
Deliverable
Technical Feasibility Report with architecture recommendations, risk assessment, and development roadmap
Why It Matters
A validated concept that can't be built affordably isn't valuable. Technical assessment ensures you understand not just if users want it, but if you can actually deliver it.
Decision & Roadmap
What Happens
We synthesize everything—user research, validation testing, technical assessment—into a clear recommendation and actionable next steps.
Key Activities
- Findings synthesis across all workstreams
- Go/no-go recommendation with supporting evidence
- Development roadmap (if go decision)
- Pivot recommendations (if adjustments needed)
- Kill criteria discussion (if fundamental issues identified)
Deliverable
Executive Summary with decision recommendation, supporting evidence, and detailed next steps
Why It Matters
The entire sprint leads to this: a defensible decision backed by evidence. Whether you proceed, pivot, or pause—you'll know why.
Your Complete Validation Package
Interactive Prototype
A clickable, high-fidelity prototype you can share with stakeholders, investors, and potential customers. Includes all core screens and user flows. Delivered in Figma with export options.
User Research Report
Comprehensive synthesis of user interviews and research findings. Includes verbatim quotes, insight themes, validated/invalidated assumptions, and user personas refined by actual data.
Validation Test Results
Detailed documentation of usability testing outcomes. Task completion rates, friction points identified, user sentiment analysis, and specific recommendations for addressing issues.
Technical Feasibility Assessment
Engineering evaluation of your concept including recommended architecture, technology stack, integration considerations, scalability analysis, and risk identification with mitigation strategies.
Development Roadmap
If proceeding, a detailed roadmap for MVP development. Includes feature prioritization, development phases, timeline estimates, resource requirements, and budget ranges.
Go/No-Go Recommendation
Executive summary with clear recommendation, supporting evidence, and confidence level. If pivoting, includes alternative directions to explore. If proceeding, includes immediate next steps.
All Source Materials
Raw research recordings (with permission), design files, research notes, and technical documentation. Everything you need for internal review or to continue with another team.
When Rapid Prototyping Makes Sense
Is Rapid Prototyping Right for You?
Startup Founders
Your Challenge
Limited runway, unlimited uncertainty. Every dollar and week spent on unvalidated assumptions is risk you can't afford.
How We Help
Compress months of guessing into weeks of knowing. Get evidence that your idea has market fit—or save your resources for something that does.
Best For
Product Managers
Your Challenge
Stakeholders want new features, engineering capacity is limited, and building the wrong thing damages credibility. You need evidence to prioritize effectively.
How We Help
Validate feature concepts before they enter the development queue. Give your team confidence that they're building what users actually want.
Best For
Non-Technical Founders
Your Challenge
You have domain expertise and a compelling vision, but the technical world is unfamiliar. You're not sure what's possible, what it costs, or how to evaluate development partners.
How We Help
Translate your vision into something tangible. Assess technical feasibility in plain language. Prepare you to have informed conversations with technical partners.
Best For
Innovation Teams
Your Challenge
Corporate politics require evidence before budget approval. "Build it and see" isn't an option in risk-averse organizations.
How We Help
Generate the external validation evidence that internal sponsors need. Create professional deliverables suitable for executive review.
Best For
Technical Leaders
Your Challenge
You can build anything, but should you? Engineering time is your most precious resource. Committing to unvalidated concepts wastes it.
How We Help
Provide the user validation layer your technical expertise needs. Ensure you're building the right thing, not just building things right.
Best For
Questions We Hear Often
Tools & Technologies We Use
Prototyping Platforms
We select tools based on your specific needs—balancing fidelity, speed, and what you'll use after the sprint:
Figma
Our primary platform for interactive prototypes. Powerful, collaborative, and industry standard.
Framer
For more complex interactions and near-functional prototypes.
Webflow
When web-based prototypes need to look and feel production-ready.
Bubble / Glide
For functional prototypes that need real data interactions.
Research Methods
Different questions require different approaches:
Structured Interviews
Deep qualitative insights from target users
Usability Testing
Moderated sessions observing users interact with prototypes
Concept Testing
Validating value propositions before detailed design
Surveys
Quantitative validation when sample size matters
Analytics Integration
When testing with live prototypes
Technical Assessment
Our engineering team evaluates feasibility across:
Architecture Options
Monolith vs microservices, build vs buy decisions
Technology Stacks
Frontend, backend, mobile, infrastructure recommendations
Integration Requirements
APIs, third-party services, data sources
Scalability Considerations
Performance requirements and growth implications
Security & Compliance
Relevant regulatory and security requirements
Investment & Engagement Options
Validation Sprint
Comprehensive Validation
Custom Engagements
What Affects Investment
Prototype complexity
Number of screens, interaction depth, fidelity level
Research scope
Number of participants, geographic distribution, recruitment difficulty
Technical depth
Architecture complexity, integration requirements, compliance needs
Timeline
Compressed timelines require additional resources
Stop Guessing. Start Validating.
Every week you spend building without validation is a week of risk. Every dollar spent on assumptions is a dollar that might be wasted.
Get a working prototype, real user feedback, and a clear decision in 2-3 weeks. Whether you proceed, pivot, or pause—you'll know why.
Have questions about whether rapid prototyping is right for your situation?
At a Glance
Real Impact
Outcomes
See the math →- •Clickable prototype covering 5-7 critical flows
- •Tech spike code for riskiest section (e.g., RAG, CV, SSO)
- •Risk register with cost/effort T-shirt sizing
- •Clear decision: proceed, park, or pivot
What You Get (Acceptance Criteria)
Our standards →Timeline
2 weeks
Team
architect, UX, FE, MLE/BE (spike)
Inputs We Need
- •User journeys or workflow maps
- •Riskiest technical assumption (RAG accuracy, latency, integration)
- •Target users for testing (5+ participants)
- •Decision criteria and stakeholders
- •Budget and timeline constraints
Tech & Deployment
Figma or code-based prototype; tech spike in target stack (Python/Node/Rails); cloud or on-prem
Proof We Show
Full evidence list →Complete Decision Brief Package
See the full structure of what executives receive: ROI scenarios, risk register, user validation synthesis, and next-step recommendations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Need More Capabilities?
Explore related services that complement this offering.
Related Services
Related Products
Popular Industries
Ready to Get Started?
Book a free 30-minute scoping call with a solution architect.
Procurement team? Visit Trust Center →