Skip to content
Allerin, go to homepage

TrackSentinel

AI-powered inspection for rail surface conditions, tie health, fastener integrity, and ballast indicators. Supplements visual inspection programs with consistent, documented detection.

TrackSentinel is camera-based surface inspection for rail, ties, fasteners and ballast that runs on hi-rail vehicles, wayside mounts or locomotives, scores each finding by severity and traffic, and sends the verified ones to your CMMS with the FRA documentation attached.

Who is this for?

Track engineers and maintenance-of-way leads at short line, regional and transit railroads that do not own a dedicated inspection car, and Class I teams covering branch lines and yards beyond the mainline ultrasonic programme. It supplements the qualified inspector under 49 CFR 213.7; it does not replace that person or the ultrasonic test.

What problem does it solve?

A visual patrol is only as consistent as the day. The same head checking gets graded differently by two inspectors a week apart, documentation lives in a notebook, and coverage on a short line with no detector car depends on how many miles one crew can walk before dark.

Surface conditions that are cheap to fix when found (shelling, a missing clip, fouled ballast at the tie ends) become the internal defect that only ultrasonic testing can see later. The gap between patrols is where that happens.

How does it work?

Cameras (visible and thermal, 4K recommended) mount on a hi-rail vehicle, a wayside post or a locomotive and capture track imagery continuously, at up to 25 mph on hi-rail and faster on a locomotive. An NVIDIA Jetson processes it on the spot: no cloud upload, detections stay on your network.

Models trained on railroad imagery grade rail surface conditions (head checking, squats, visible cracks, shelling, corrugation), tie condition for wood and concrete (plate cut, rail seat abrasion, splits), fastener anomalies (missing or broken clips and spikes) and ballast surface indicators (fouling, voiding, insufficient ballast at tie ends). Each detection carries a confidence score, a severity class aligned with 49 CFR 213.113 terminology, GPS and a timestamp.

A qualified inspector verifies every detection and can override any classification; their judgement stays authoritative. Verified defects route to Maximo, SAP PM or Infor EAM with coordinates, photos, severity and a recommended action, prioritised by severity, location (mainline or yard) and tonnage per day. After site calibration the true positive rate on anomalies of 5 mm or more is above 90 percent, fastener detection above 95 percent, and the false positive rate under 5 percent.

Capabilities

  • Surface defect detection: rail, ties, fasteners, ballast
  • Priority scoring by defect severity, location, and traffic volume
  • FRA Part 213 documentation support with GPS, timestamps, and defect codes
  • Wayside camera integration (visible + thermal) for continuous monitoring
  • Trend analysis dashboard for track degradation patterns

Outcomes

  • Detection rate ↑ 40%+
  • Coverage ↑ 50-65%
  • Emergency costs ↓ 30-45%

What does it connect to?

  • CMMS and EAM: IBM Maximo, SAP PM, Infor EAM, REST API for custom systems
  • Existing wayside systems (Salient, Lynxrail and others) through Modbus, OPC-UA and REST, adding surface detection beside hot bearing and wheel impact detectors
  • Exports: FRA-compatible reports, GIS shapefile, CSV; milepost linear referencing and WGS84
  • Connectivity: cellular or offline batch upload; IP67 wayside enclosures, 12 or 24 V vehicle power

How is it deployed, and how long does it take?

Proof of concept in 2 to 4 weeks: site survey, baseline corridor scans, calibration to your conditions and accuracy validation against manual assessment. Pilot in 6 to 8 weeks with live inference on a priority corridor, CMMS integration and threshold tuning from inspector feedback. Then multi-corridor rollout with drift monitoring and quarterly accuracy reviews.

The limit is physics. Transverse fissures and other internal defects occur inside the rail steel and are invisible to a camera; they still need ultrasonic testing. TrackSentinel finds the surface conditions that precede them, which is how it pre-positions the UT programme.

Deployment complete in 60 to 90 days. Deployments report detection up 40 percent or more, coverage up 50 to 65 percent and emergency costs down 30 to 45 percent, with the honest note that results vary by railroad size, track class and operating context.

Industry context

Explore the related workflows and other solutions for your industry.

Frequently asked questions

No. Internal defects (transverse fissures, detail fractures, compound fissures) occur inside the rail steel and require ultrasonic testing. TrackSentinel detects SURFACE defects visible to camera systems. For internal rail inspection, ultrasonic testing services from established providers are required.
Surface rail conditions (head checking, squats, visible cracks, shelling, corrugation), tie condition (plate cut severity, rail seat abrasion, cracks, splits), fastener condition (missing/broken clips and spikes, tie plate condition), and ballast surface indicators (fouling, voiding, insufficient ballast).
TrackSentinel supplements, but does not replace, FRA-mandated visual inspections by qualified personnel (§213.7). The system provides consistent documentation and helps prioritize inspection resources, but regulatory requirements for human inspection remain in effect.
Different technologies for different defects. Ultrasonic testing finds internal defects invisible to cameras (transverse fissures, detail fractures). TrackSentinel finds surface defects and component conditions. Many railroads use both: UT for internal defects, vision systems for surface conditions.
After site-specific calibration, TrackSentinel achieves <5% false positive rate. False positives are minimized through seasonal baseline establishment during PoC and ongoing model tuning based on inspector feedback.
Surface defects like head checking can progress into internal defects (detail fractures) if not addressed. TrackSentinel's early surface detection helps railroads address conditions before they become internal defects detectable only by ultrasonic testing.
Yes. TrackSentinel integrates with Salient, Lynxrail, and other wayside systems via standard protocols (Modbus, OPC-UA, REST APIs). It augments existing hot bearing detectors (HBD) and wheel impact detectors (WID) with surface defect detection.
Defects are scored by severity, location (mainline vs. yard), and traffic volume (tonnage/day). Priority routing ensures critical defects reach track gangs immediately while lower-priority items queue for scheduled maintenance windows.

Related

Ready to build your product?

Senior engineering team, measurable outcomes, fast routes to production.

Procurement team? See our Trust Center →